Ability grouping has been and
continues to be a frequently debated topic in regard to gifted education. While
some have moved to abolish ability grouping altogether, others see the benefits
that ability grouping can have. Ability grouping can take different forms. A grade
level can be divided into classes based on student ability. This form of ability
grouping is often referred to as tracking.
Another form of ability grouping can occur within the classroom for
small-group instruction or cooperative learning activities. When making an
argument for or against ability grouping, one must take into account which of
these forms of ability grouping is being discussed.
When grade levels are grouped by
ability, it is the gifted children who are most likely to benefit. Often times, they will have the smaller class
size and the more enthusiastic teacher. According to James Gallagher, they will
most likely benefit from a richer curriculum and more individualization within
their classroom. When gifted students are grouped homogeneously, teachers may
be able to challenge students to reach a deeper level of understanding. Students grouped into a gifted class will
likely be further challenged by their peers. Research has shown that gifted students in a
homogeneously grouped class have scored higher than their peers in mixed-ability
class.
Jeanie Oaks argues that tracking is
discriminatory because many minority children are often grouped together in a
slower track. She also argues that tracking is unfair to those in the slower
tracks because they are less likely to get a rich education, and they may not
have as many opportunities to delve deeper into academics. When students are
grouped heterogeneously, all students are more likely to be presented with the
same learning opportunities. In a
heterogeneously grouped class, students can interact with peers of all ability
levels. Higher achieving students may
have the opportunity to teach or help another student. A student who is struggling can turn to a
peer for assistance. In a
heterogeneously grouped class, teachers can use cooperative learning activities
to further group students. Depending on
the activity or assignment, the teacher may use heterogeneous grouping when
grouping his/her students. However, the teacher has the option to group his/her
students based on ability. This may allow gifted students to delve into a
higher depth of knowledge, and it may allow the teacher to work more closely
with a group that may need a little more assistance.
Both of these arguments have valid
points. It is important for gifted
students to have the opportunity to work alongside other gifted students so
they can challenge each other; however, shouldn’t we want this very same thing
for all students? Our district’s use of
a weekly pull-out program for gifted students provides these students with a
more challenging curriculum while still allowing them to interact with students
of all ability levels.
No comments:
Post a Comment